A Harvard Specialist shares his thoughts on testosterone-replacement therapy
A meeting with Abraham Morgentaler, M.D.
It might be said that testosterone is what makes men, men. It gives them their characteristic deep voices, large muscles, and body and facial hair, differentiating them from girls. It stimulates the development of the genitals , plays a role in sperm production, fuels libido, and contributes to normal erections. It also fosters the creation of red blood cells, boosts mood, and assists cognition.
As time passes, the testicular"machinery" that makes testosterone slowly becomes less powerful, and testosterone levels begin to drop, by approximately 1 percent per year, starting in the 40s. As guys get in their 50s, 60s, and beyond, they might begin to have symptoms and signs of low testosterone like reduced sex drive and sense of vitality, erectile dysfunction, decreased energy, reduced muscle mass and bone density, and anemia. Taken together, these signs and symptoms are often called hypogonadism ("hypo" meaning low working and"gonadism" speaking to the testicles). Yet it's an underdiagnosed issue, with only about 5 percent of those affected receiving treatment.
But little consensus exists on what constitutes low testosterone, when testosterone supplementation makes sense, or what dangers patients face. Much of the current debate focuses on the long-held belief that testosterone may stimulate prostate cancer.
Dr. Abraham Morgentaler, an associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School and the director of Men's Health Boston, specializes in treating prostate ailments and male reproductive and sexual problems. He has developed particular expertise in treating lower testosterone levels. In this interview, Dr. Morgentaler shares his perspectives on current controversies, the treatment plans he uses with his own patients, and he believes specialists should rethink the potential connection between testosterone-replacement treatment and prostate cancer.
Symptoms and diagnosisWhat signs and symptoms of low testosterone prompt the typical person to see a doctor?
As a urologist, I have a tendency to see men since they have sexual complaints. The main hallmark of low testosterone is low sexual libido or desire, but another can be erectile dysfunction, and any guy who complains of erectile dysfunction should get his testosterone level checked. Men can experience other symptoms, like more trouble achieving an orgasm, less-intense orgasms, a much lesser amount of fluid out of ejaculation, and a feeling of numbness in the manhood when they see or experience something which would normally be arousing.
The more of the symptoms you will find, the more likely it is that a man has low testosterone. Many physicians tend to discount these"soft symptoms" as a normal part of aging, however, they are often treatable and reversible by decreasing testosterone levels.
Aren't those the very same symptoms that guys have when they're treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH?
Not precisely. There are a number of medications that may reduce libido, including the BPH medication finasteride (Proscar) and dutasteride (Avodart). Those drugs may also decrease the quantity of the ejaculatory fluid, no question. But a reduction in orgasm intensity normally does not go together with treatment for BPH. Erectile dysfunction does not ordinarily go along with it , though certainly if a person has less sex drive or less interest, it is more of a challenge to get a fantastic erection.
How do you decide whether or not a man is a candidate for testosterone-replacement treatment?
There are two ways we determine whether somebody has reduced testosterone. One is a blood test and the other is by characteristic signs and symptoms, and the correlation between those two approaches is far from perfect. Generally guys with the lowest testosterone have the most symptoms and men with highest testosterone possess the least. But there are a number of men who have low levels of testosterone in their blood and have no signs.
Looking purely at the biochemical numbers, The Endocrine Society* believes low testosterone to be a entire testosterone level of less than 300 ng/dl, and I think that's a sensible guide. But no one really agrees on a number. It is similar to diabetes, where if your fasting sugar is over a certain level, they'll say,"Okay, you've got it." With testosterone, that break point isn't quite as apparent.
*Note: The Endocrine Society publishes clinical practice guidelines with recommendations for who check it out should and should not receive testosterone therapy. Is total testosterone the ideal point to be measuring? Or should we be measuring something else? This is just another area of confusion and great debate, but I do not think that it's as confusing as it is apparently in the literature. When most doctors learned about testosterone in medical school, they heard about overall testosterone, or all of the testosterone in the body. But about half of their testosterone that is circulating in the bloodstream is not readily available to cells. It's closely bound to a carrier molecule known as sex hormone--binding globulin, which we abbreviate as SHBG. The available part of overall testosterone is known as free testosterone, and it is readily available to the cells. Though it's just a little portion of the total, the free testosterone level is a pretty good indicator of low testosterone. It is not ideal, but the significance is greater compared to testosterone.
|